Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-776
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2018
>
2018-776
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2021 10:27:26 AM
Creation date
8/20/2018 2:03:11 PM
Metadata
2018-776
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Advisory Opinion
Docket Number
2018-776
Requesting Party
Eric P. Duplantis
Decision Date
8/17/2018
Law
La. R.S. 42:1111C(2)(d)
Caption
St. Mary Parish would not be prohibited from transacting business with a company that employs a St. Mary councilman provided the councilman is a wage-earning or salaried employee, his salary would be unaffected by the contractual relationship between the company and St. Mary Parish, the councilman owns no more than 25% of the company and is not an officer, director, trustee, or partner of the company.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6 <br /> First, the Board is aided in its interpretation of the <br /> prohibitory provisions of the Code, particularly, by the Legislature's <br /> Declaration of Policy contained in the Preamble to the Code at Section <br /> 1101 B. There, it is provided that a fundamental purpose of the Code is <br /> to insure that governmental decisions are ". . . made in the proper <br /> channel of the governmental structure . . ." and that ". . . public <br /> . . . employment not be used for private gain . . . ." <br /> Second, in interpreting a provision of the Code, the Board <br /> attempts to define the evil or mischief's sought to be eradicated by the <br /> particular section of the Code under scrutiny; and, having focused its <br /> attention on that evil or mischief, the Board interprets that section of <br /> the Code in such a fashion as would thwart that evil or mischief, on the <br /> one hand, and yet create no unreasonable impediments to public service. <br /> • <br /> Applying these standards of interpretation to Section <br /> 1111 C(2) (d) in the context of "A", a salaried employee of an industrial <br /> facility, it is clear to the Board that Section 1111 C(2)(d) was neither <br /> designed nor intended to prohibit "A" from continued salaried employment <br /> with the "ABC" Company, under the given circumstances, notwithstanding <br /> that the "ABC" Company "is seeking to obtain contractual or other <br /> business or financial relationships with the ('XYZ' Parish Council]." <br /> This ruling is a limited one. The Board rules only that Section <br /> 1111 C(2)(d) is inapplicable to those public servants who meet all of <br /> the following criteria: <br /> 1. The public servant must be a regularly <br /> compensated employee of the nongovernmental "person" <br /> engaged pursuant to a uniform standard of personnel <br /> administration; (i.e., a salaried or wage—earning <br /> employee) <br /> 4110 2. The salary, wages and other usual employment <br /> emoluments of the public servant must be <br /> 2 G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.