Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-724
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2024
>
2022-724
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:41:51 PM
Creation date
10/3/2024 10:39:02 AM
Metadata
2022-724
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Consent Opinion
Docket Number
2022-724
Parties Involved
Dupre-Carrier-Godchaux Agency, Inc.
Willie Godchaux
Bobby J. Guidroz
Agency at Issue
St. Landry Parish Sheriff's Office
Decision Date
9/6/2024
Law
La.R.S. 42:1113A(1)(a)
Caption
A consent opinion that Dupre-Carrier-Godchaux Agency, Inc. violated La. R.S. 42:1113A(1)(a) by virtue of entering into transactions with the St. Landry Parish Sheriff's Office while Willie Godchaux, the immediate family member of St. Landry Parish Sheriff Bobby Guidroz, had a controlling interest in Dupre-Carrier-Godchaux Agency, Inc.
Ethics Subject Matters
Prohibited Transactions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ethics Board Docket No. 2022-724 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> assess if the Ethics Adjudicatory Board determines a violation of the Ethics Code has occurred: <br /> §1153. Penalties <br /> B. Upon a determination that any public employee or other person has violated <br /> any provision of any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics except <br /> violations of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act which shall be governed by <br /> Chapter 11 of Title 18 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, the Ethics <br /> Adjudicatory Board may remove, suspend, or order a reduction in pay,or demotion <br /> of the public employee or other person, or impose a fine of not more than ten <br /> thousand dollars, or both. <br /> §1155. Penalties for illegal gain; forfeiture of gifts, payments <br /> A. If an investigation conducted pursuant to this Part reveals that any public <br /> servant or other person has violated any law within the jurisdiction of the <br /> Board of Ethics to his economic advantage, and after an adjudicatory hearing <br /> on the matter, the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may order the payment of <br /> penalties. Recovery may include, in addition to an amount equal to such <br /> economic advantage, penalties not to exceed one half of the amount of the <br /> economic advantage. Any appeal of such final decision by the Ethics <br /> Adjudicatory Board shall be to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, pursuant to <br /> R.S. 42:1142. <br /> V. <br /> OPINION: <br /> It is the opinion of the BOE that DCG violated Section 1113A(1)(a) of the Ethics Code by <br /> virtue of entering into transactions with SLPSO while Mr. Godchaux, the immediate family <br /> member of Mr. Guidroz, had a controlling interest in DCG. Section 1113A of the Ethics Code <br /> prohibits a company in which an immediate family member of Mr. Guidroz has a controlling <br /> interest from entering into transactions with Mr. Guidroz's agency. <br /> If this matter proceeded to a public hearing before the Ethics Adjudicatory Board, and the <br /> Ethics Adjudicatory Board found a violation of the Ethics Code, the Ethics Adjudicatory Board <br /> could impose a fine of up to $10,000 for each violation of the Ethics Code, pursuant to Section <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.