Louisiana state seal Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home Charges Search EAB Decisions Search
Ethics Board Docket No. 2025-171 <br /> Page 7 of14 <br /> (25)(a)(i) defines "thing of economic value" to mean money or any other thing <br /> having economic value, and includes but not limited to, any loan, except a bona <br /> fide loan made by a duly licensed lending institution at the normal rate of interest, <br /> any property interest, interest in a contract, merchandise, service, and any <br /> employment or other arrangement involving a right to compensation. <br /> 4. <br /> The following provisions proscribe the penalties the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may assess <br /> if the Ethics Adjudicatory Board determines a violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics has <br /> occurred: <br /> §1153. Penalties <br /> B. Upon a determination that any public employee or other person has violated <br /> any provision of any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics except <br /> violations of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act which shall be governed by <br /> Chapter 11 of Title 18 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, the Ethics <br /> Adjudicatory Board may remove, suspend,or order a reduction in pay, or demotion <br /> of the public employee or other person, or impose a fine of not more than ten <br /> thousand dollars, or both. <br /> �x * * <br /> §1155. Penalties for illegal gain; forfeiture of gifts, payments <br /> A. If an investigation conducted pursuant to this Part reveals that any public <br /> servant or other person has violated any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of <br /> Ethics to his economic advantage, and after an adjudicatory hearing on the matter, <br /> the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may order the payment of penalties. Recovery may <br /> include, in addition to an amount equal to such economic advantage, penalties not <br /> to exceed one half of the amount of the economic advantage. Any appeal of such <br /> final decision by the Ethics Adjudicatory Board shall be to the Court of Appeal, <br /> First Circuit,pursuant to R.S. 42:1142. <br /> V. <br /> OPINION: <br /> It is the opinion of the BOE that LORA, Chromos and Mr. Berthelot violated Section 1117 <br /> of the Ethics Code by virtue of making a loan to Mr. Adams while LORA had contractual <br />