Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-1632
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2012
>
2011-1632
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2021 2:46:38 PM
Creation date
2/6/2012 9:29:30 AM
Metadata
2011-1632
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Advisory Opinion
Docket Number
2011-1632
Requesting Party
Steven R. Thomas
Parties Involved
Mr. Stephen R. Thomas
11th and 42nd Judicial District Indigent Defender Fund
Agency at Issue
11th and 42nd Judicial District Indigent Defender's Office
Decision Date
1/20/2012
Law
1113A
Caption
Advisory opinion from Mr. Stephen R. Thomas, Chief Public Defender of the 11th & 42nd Judicial Districts, as to whether he is required to pay the utilities at his office from his personal salary or whether payment can be made from the 11th/42nd Judicial District Indigent Defender Fund.
Ethics Subject Matters
Prohibited Contracts
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 3 <br /> Ethics Docket 2011-1632 <br /> application fees,etc. The Public Defender Board supplements that funding with an annual District <br /> Assistance Fund grant. However, you have absolute authority as to how that money is spent with <br /> the exception of your own compensation which was "grandfathered" in the Act, at a minimum, of <br /> what I was being paid on January1, 2007. You stated that the Board does, of course, have <br /> "regulatory authority" over whether you are complying with the requirements of the Act. <br /> Lastly, you state that you employ all the employees of your office. All the attorneys are 1099 <br /> employees. All the office staff who work in your office are full-time, W-2 employees. You are also <br /> a full-time public defender but you are a 1099 employee because that is the way your"contract"was <br /> drafted by the Board. Based on the foregoing, your question is whether it would be ethical to pay <br /> the utilities and telephone bills listed of the I l th/42nd Judicial District Defender's Office out of the <br /> 11 th/42nd Judicial District Indigent Defender Fund. <br /> The Board concluded and instructed me to inform you,that no violation of the Code of Ethics would <br /> appear to be presented if the payment of the above named utilities were paid from the 11`h/42"`' <br /> Judicial District Indigent Defender Fund. Section 1113A of the Code does prohibit a public servant <br /> from bidding on or entering into a contract, subcontract, or transaction under the supervision or <br /> jurisdiction of the public servant's agency. However, by paying the utilities mentioned above you <br /> would not be entering into a contract,subcontract,or transaction under the supervision or jurisdiction <br /> of your agency(1 1`h/42'Judicial District Indigent Defender's Office). You will not be negotiating <br /> a separate contract with the Louisiana Public Defender Board or the 11`h/42"`' Judicial District <br /> Indigent Defender Office. You will simply be paying directly from the fund established by La. R.S. <br /> 15:168. The utilities you wish to pay from this fund are similar to other payments that are made <br /> from the fund (e.g. supplies, attorney's salaries, and expert witness fees, etc.). Further, according <br /> to statements made by you and General Counsel for the Louisiana Public Defender Board, you <br /> administer your own district public defender fund,and determine how the money in the fund is spent. <br /> Therefore, the Code of Ethics would not prohibit the 11`h/42' Judicial District Indigent Defender <br /> Fund from paying the named utilities. <br /> This advisory opinion is based solely on the facts as set forth herein. Changes to the facts presented <br /> may result in a different application of the provisions of the Code of Ethics. The Board issues no <br /> opinion as to past conduct or laws other than Code of Governmental Ethics. If you have any <br /> questions, please contact me at (225) 219-5600 or(800) 842-6630. <br /> Sincere y, <br /> LOUI ANAs BO-ARD OF ETHICS <br /> -`Brent E. Durham'- <br /> For the Board <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.