Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-659
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2024
>
2023-659
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2025 1:48:05 PM
Creation date
10/29/2024 3:48:23 PM
Metadata
2023-659
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Consent Opinion
Docket Number
2023-659
Parties Involved
Greater Education Opportunities Foundation, Inc. (GEO Foundation)
Linda Johnson
Agency at Issue
GEO Academies EBR
Decision Date
10/25/2024
Law
La. R.S. 42:1117
La. R.S. 42:1111C(2)(d)
Caption
A consent opinion that GEO Foundation violated La. R.S. 42:1117 by paying Linda Johnson for services she rendered to GEO Foundation while she was an appointed member of the GEO Academics EBR Board of Directors and while GEO Foundation had a contractual, business, and financial relationship with GEO Academies EBR, which violated La. R.S. 42: 1111Cā(2)āā(d)ā.
Ethics Subject Matters
Prohibited Sources
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ethics Board Docket Nos. 2023-659 <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br /> employee or other person,or impose a fine ofnot more than ten thousand dollars, or <br /> both. <br /> §1153. Penalties <br /> A.If an investigation conducted pursuant to this Part reveals that any public servant <br /> or other person has violated any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics to <br /> his economic advantage, and after an adjudicatory hearing on the matter,the Ethics <br /> Adjudicatory Board may order the payment of penalties. Recovery may include, in <br /> addition to an amount equal to such economic advantage,penalties not to exceed one <br /> half of the amount of the economic advantage. <br /> V. <br /> OPINION: <br /> It is the opinion of the Board that GEO Foundation violated La. R.S.42:1117 by remitting <br /> payment to Linda Johnson for services she rendered to GEO Foundation while she was an appointed <br /> member of the GEO Academies EBR Board of Directors and while GEO Foundation had a <br /> contractual,business and financial relationship with GEO Academies EBR,which was prohibited by <br /> La.R.S. 42:1111C(2)(d). <br /> As an appointed member of the GEO Academies EBR Board of Directors,Ms.Johnson was <br /> subject to the provisions of Code of Governmental Ethics pursuant to La.R.S. 17:3996B(20). Her <br /> agency, as defined by La. R.S. 42:1102(a),was GEO Academies EBR and all of the schools under <br /> its jurisdiction pursuant to the Charter School Contracts between GEO Academies EBR and the <br /> Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. <br /> GEO Foundation is a person as defined by La. R.S.42:1102(16)as it is a private nonprofit <br /> organization. <br /> As an appointed member of a board or commission, Ms. Johnson was prohibited from <br /> receiving a thing of economic value for services rendered to a person that has or was seeking to have <br /> a contractual,or other business or financial relationship with her board. Therefore,Linda Johnson's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.