Louisiana state seal Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home Charges Search EAB Decisions Search
Ethics Board Docket No. 2014-1278 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br /> (ii) Appointed by any elected official when acting in an official capacity, <br /> and the appointment is to a post or position wherein the appointee is to <br /> serve the governmental entity or an agency thereof, either as a member of <br /> an agency, or as an employee thereof. <br /> (iii) Engaged in the performance of a governmental function. <br /> (iv)Under the supervision or authority of an elected official or another <br /> employee of the governmental entity. <br /> (19) 'Public servant" means a public employee or an elected official. <br /> (21) "Substantial economic interest" means an economic interest which is of <br /> greater benefit to the public servant or other person than to a general class <br /> or group of persons; <br /> V. BOE'S OPINION <br /> It is the opinion of the BOE that Respondents were public servants pursuant to the <br /> provisions of the Contract and that their agency was the scope of the Contract. It is further the <br /> opinion of the BOE that Respondents violated La. R.S. 42:1113(A)(1)(a) by entering into the ten <br /> subsequent contracts with St. John the Baptist Parish to perform engineering services, which were <br /> under the supervision or jurisdiction of the original Contract. Additionally, it is the opinion of the <br /> BOE that Respondents violated La. R.S. 42:1112A by participating through the Contract on the <br /> ten additional engineering projects. <br /> VI. RESPONDENTS' STATEMENT <br /> A two-day evidentiary hearing before the 19`x' Judicial District Court determined that the <br /> BOE had exceeded its power and labeled the Respondents — a family business that has been <br /> operating for decades — as "public servants" of the local government entities they had been <br /> contracting with since 1977. Respondent believes this action was an improper attempt to reclassify <br /> a private business as a public employee for ethics purposes. Settling this matter is not an admission <br />