Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-1093
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2025
>
2023-1093
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2025 12:09:15 PM
Creation date
11/10/2025 4:32:14 PM
Metadata
2023-1093
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Consent Opinion
Docket Number
2023-1093
Parties Involved
Dakota McKinney
Agency at Issue
Mangham Police Department
Decision Date
11/7/2025
Law
1111C(1)(a)
1113A
Caption
Consent opinion that Dakota McKinney, in his capacity as an employee of the Mangham Police Department, violated R.S. 42:1111Cā(1)āā(a)ā by receiving compensation from Trigger for services related to traffiic law enforcement; nad, violated r.S. 42:1113A by entering into transactions with Trigger that were under the supervision of his agency.
Ethics Subject Matters
Outside Employment
Payment from Third Parties
Prohibited Transactions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ethics Board Docket No. 2023-1093 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> 4. <br /> The following provisions proscribe the penalties the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may assess <br /> if the Ethics Adjudicatory Board determines a violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics has <br /> occurred: <br /> §1153. Penalties <br /> B. Upon a determination that any public employee or other person has violated <br /> any provision of any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics except <br /> violations of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act which shall be governed by <br /> Chapter 11 of Title 18 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, the Ethics <br /> Adjudicatory Board may remove, suspend, or order a reduction in pay, or demotion <br /> of the public employee or other person, or impose a fine of not more than ten <br /> thousand dollars, or both. <br /> * * * <br /> §1155. Penalties for illegal gain; forfeiture of gifts, payments <br /> A. If an investigation conducted pursuant to this Part reveals that any public <br /> servant or other person has violated any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of <br /> Ethics to his economic advantage, and after an adjudicatory hearing on the matter, <br /> the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may order the payment of penalties. Recovery may <br /> include, in addition to an amount equal to such economic advantage, penalties not <br /> to exceed one half of the amount of the economic advantage. Any appeal of such <br /> final decision by the Ethics Adjudicatory Board shall be to the Court of Appeal, <br /> First Circuit, pursuant to R.S. 42:1142. <br /> V. <br /> OPINION: <br /> It is the opinion of the BOE that Mr. McKinney, in his capacity as an employee of MPD, <br /> violated Section 1111C(1)(a) of the Ethics Code by virtue of being paid by Trigger for off-duty <br /> services related to traffic law enforcement. Section 1111C(1)(a) of the Ethics Code prohibits Mr. <br /> McKinney from receiving compensation from Trigger for services that he provides to MPD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.