Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CN 1980-065
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
1980
>
CN 1980-065
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 4:01:07 PM
Creation date
4/25/2010 3:43:23 PM
Metadata
CN 1980-065
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Advisory Opinion
Docket Number
CN 1980-065
Parties Involved
State Government
Decision Date
9/15/1980
Law
42:1116A
Caption
An advisory opinion as to the propriety of state employees soliciting personal services and favors from employees under their supervision
Ethics Subject Matters
Abuse of Office
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 2 - <br /> other blic to <br /> pu employees subject to their general supervision or control personal <br /> services and personal favors irregardless of whether or not these personal <br /> services and favors are performed during the public servant's regular tour of <br /> duty or during non- working hours. <br /> In those circumstances where a legitimate personal relationship exists <br /> between an employee and his supervisor, there is nothing in the Code that would <br /> prevent the employee from performing on a strictly voluntary basis some personal <br /> favor or service for his supervisor; however, the Code strictly prevents the <br /> supervisor from using his position of authority in any manner whatsoever intended <br /> to induce, coerce, compel or mandate the employee into performing any services <br /> for him regardless of whether or not such services are performed during or after <br /> regular working hours. Moreover, it is the opinion of the Commission that the <br /> employer- employee relationship by itself may constitute a sufficient element of <br /> "coercion" and "compulsion" to create a presumption that such services by the <br /> employee are rendered to the employer in violation of Section 1116, as quoted <br /> above. In order to avoid Section 1116 violations, it is essential that (a) the <br /> services be completely voluntary and (b) that there be no element of coercion, <br /> compulsion or solicitation by the supervisor. <br /> Moreover, we are of the opinion that any effort by a supervisor to allow <br /> an employee under his supervision to perform activities on the job under <br /> circumstances not permitted of other employees clearly would be an action proscribed <br /> by pertinent portions of the Code of Ethics if the actions tend to obligate the <br /> employee to the supervisor. <br /> Agency heads should caution supervisory employees to refrain from extracting <br /> • <br /> 92 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.