Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-326
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2022
>
2022-326
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 8:39:20 AM
Creation date
7/12/2022 12:46:55 PM
Metadata
2022-326
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Advisory Opinion
Docket Number
2022-326
Requesting Party
Andrew L. Halbrook
Parties Involved
Andrew L. Halbrook
Andrew H. Halbrook
Agency at Issue
Ruston City
Decision Date
7/8/2022
Law
1112B(1)
1120
1119B
1119C(2)
Caption
Advisory opinion that the Code of Ethics does not prohibit the continued employment of the son if his father is elected to the Ruston City Council since the son will have been employed for more than one year prior to his father's election.
Ethics Subject Matters
Nepotism
Participation
Recusal
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
La. R.S. 42:1102(21) defines "substantial economic interest" as an economic interest which is of <br /> greater benefit to the public servant or other person than to a general class or group of persons, <br /> except: (a)the interest that the public servant has in his position, office,rank, salary, per diem, <br /> other matter arising solely from his public employment or office; (b) the that an elected official <br /> who is elected to a house, body, or authority has in a position or office of such house, body, or <br /> authority which is required to be filled by a member of such house, body, or authority by law, <br /> legislative rule, or home rule charter, (c)the interest that a person has as a member of the general <br /> public. <br /> La.R.S.42:1120 provides that if an elected official, in the discharge of a duty or responsibility of <br /> his office or position, would be required to vote on a matter which would be a violation of R.S. <br /> 42:1112,he shall recuse himself from voting. An elected official who recuses himself from voting <br /> pursuant to this Section shall not be prohibited from participating in discussion and debate <br /> concerning the matter,provided that he makes the disclosure of his conflict or potential conflict a <br /> part of the record of his agency prior to his participation in the discussion and debate and prior to <br /> the vote that is the subject of discussion or debate. <br /> La. R.S. 42:1119B provides no member of the immediate family of a member of a governing <br /> authority or the chief executive of a governmental entity shall be employed by the governmental <br /> entity. <br /> La. R.S. 42:1119C(2)provides that the provisions of this Section shall not prohibit the continued <br /> employment of any public employee nor shall it be construed to hinder, alter, or in any way affect <br /> normal promotional advancements for such public employee where a member of public <br /> employee's immediate family becomes the agency head of such public employee's agency, <br /> provided that such public employee has been employed in the agency for a period of at least one <br /> year prior to the member of the public employee's immediate family becoming the agency head. <br /> La. R.S. 42:1102(3) defines"agency head"to mean the chief executive or administrative officer <br /> of an agency or any member of a board or commission who exercises supervision over the agency. <br /> ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION <br /> 1. Whether your election to the City of Ruston would prohibit your son, Andrew H. Halbrook, <br /> from remaining employed with the City of Ruston? <br /> Generally, Section 1119B of the Code would prohibit an immediate family member of a city <br /> councilman from being employed by the City of Ruston. However, under the facts presented <br /> herein, the exception found in Section 1119C would allow your son, Andrew H. Halbrook, to <br /> continue his employment because he has been employed with the City of Ruston for more than a <br /> year on the date when you would become a member of the governing authority,and thus,an agency <br /> head. <br /> 2. If your son is responsible for preparation of portions of the city budget every year, are you <br /> allowed to vote on the budget? <br /> Page 2 of 3 (BD 2022-326) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.