Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-139 (2)
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2022
>
2021-139 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 8:36:21 AM
Creation date
9/2/2022 4:16:28 PM
Metadata
2021-139 (2)
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Consent Opinion
Docket Number
2021-139
Parties Involved
Rowdy Gaudet
Emergent Method
Agency at Issue
City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge
Decision Date
9/2/2022
Law
42:1111C(2)(d)
Caption
Consent opinion concerning Rowdy Gaudet working for Emergent Method, at time when Mr. Gaudet served as a member of the City of Baton Rouge-Parish of East Baton Rouge Metro Council and Emergent Method had a contract with the City-Parish.
Ethics Subject Matters
Prohibited Sources
Payment from Third Parties
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ethics Board Docket No. 2021-139 <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br /> 1153A of the Ethics Code. The Ethics Adjudicatory Board could also impose penalties equal to <br /> one-and-a-half times the amount of economic advantage gained,pursuant to Section 1155A of the <br /> Ethics Code. In this particular situation, it is the conclusion of the Board that the interest of the <br /> public would be served by, and the parties have agreed to resolving this matter amicably through <br /> the publication of this Consent Opinion with the imposition of a $50,000 civil penalty against <br /> Rowdy Gaudet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.