Louisiana Ethics Administration Program
Home
Charges Search
EAB Decisions Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-062
LAEthics
>
Opinions
>
SearchableOpinions
>
2023
>
2022-062
Metadata
Thumbnails
New Search
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2023 11:07:00 AM
Creation date
6/5/2023 2:23:50 PM
Metadata
2022-062
Fields
Template:
Opinion Item
Opinion Type
Consent Opinion
Docket Number
2022-062
Parties Involved
Gordan Atwell and Ashley Van Der Meulen
Agency at Issue
Louisiana State Board of Home Inspectors
Decision Date
6/2/2023
Law
La. R.S. 42:1113B
La. R.S. 42:1111(C)(2)(d)
Caption
Gordon Atwell and Ashley van der Meulen, in their capacities as members of the Louisiana State Board of Home Inspectors violated La. R.S. 42:1111(C)(2)(d) and La. R.S. 42:1113B by receiving compensation for training persons regulated by their board and submitting applications to their board to be approved as trainers.
Ethics Subject Matters
Prohibited Sources
Prohibited Transactions
Outside Employment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ethics Board Docket No. 2022-062 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />(19) defines "public servant" to mean a public employee or elected official. <br />(23) defines "transaction involving the governmental entity" to mean any <br />proceeding, application, submission, request for a ruling or other determination, <br />contract, claim, case, or other such particular matter which the public servant or <br />former public servant of the governmental entity in question knows or should know: <br />(a) Is, or will be, the subject of action by the governmental entity (b) Is one to which <br />the governmental entity is or will be a party (c) Is one in which the governmental <br />entity has a direct interest. A transaction involving the agency of a governmental <br />entity shall have the same meaning with respect to the agency. <br />4. <br />The following provisions proscribe the penalties the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may assess <br />if the Ethics Adjudicatory Board determines a violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics has <br />occurred: <br />§1153. Penalties <br />B. Upon a determination that any public employee or other person has violated <br />any provision of any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of Ethics except <br />violations of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act which shall be governed by <br />Chapter 11 of Title 18 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, the Ethics <br />Adjudicatory Board may remove, suspend, or order a reduction in pay, or demotion <br />of the public employee or other person, or impose a fine of not more than ten <br />thousand dollars, or both. <br />§1155. Penalties for illegal gain; forfeiture of gifts, payments <br />A. If an investigation conducted pursuant to this Part reveals that any public <br />servant or other person has violated any law within the jurisdiction of the Board of <br />Ethics to his economic advantage, and after an adjudicatory hearing on the matter, <br />the Ethics Adjudicatory Board may order the payment of penalties. Recovery may <br />include, in addition to an amount equal to such economic advantage, penalties not <br />to exceed one half of the amount of the economic advantage. Any appeal of such <br />final decision by the Ethics Adjudicatory Board shall be to the Court of Appeal, <br />First Circuit, pursuant to R.S. 42:1142. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.